I am very pleased to say that my poem, "Louise Bruns Recalls the Dust Bowl Cattle Slaughter, Guymon, OK, 1934" appears in the current issue of 32 Poems.
You can also read my commentary (at the 32 Poems Blog) on another poem from the same issue, Joanna Pearson's "The Arsonists in Love."
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Review: The Lady Victory by Jane Vincent Taylor
The Lady Victory, by Jane Vincent Taylor, 80 pp. Turning Point,
2012. $18.00
Commentators
on contemporary poetry often contrapose narrative and lyric, attempting to
trace trends in which one approach may be said to dominate over the other. One
could, to be sure, see a certain reassertion of narrative in the new formalism
and “expansive” poetry of the eighties and nineties, just as one could argue
that the renewed interest in French surrealism via John Ashbery’s influence has lead poets away from narrative in
the past decade. Whether this trend away from narrative results in a more
“pure” form of the lyric, is, however, a matter of opinion. But perhaps the point is moot, for Jane
Vincent Taylor’s The lady Victory –
like Eliot’s Prufrock or Yeats’ poems
from Irish legend – makes nonsense of the distinction between lyrical and
narrative approaches to poetry.
In
The Lady Victory, Taylor recounts the
experiences of young women who are hidden away at the Our Lady of Victory, a home
for unwed mothers. She tells also of the emotional life of the nuns who serve
there. The narrative is fragmentary and elusive, and the reader’s inability to
grasp fully these lives renders the poetry all the more poignant, as if we are
privy only to the images and impressions that, by virtue of their emotional
force, remain long after the particular framework of individual lives on which
they hung is gone. The effect is somewhat like reading Sappho’s fragments or
Spenser’s unfinished book of the Faerie
Queene: one is struck by the simultaneity of absence and presence. This impression is strengthened by the way
each poem seems to stand alone and yet resonates powerfully with the other
poems around it. For instance, “Friday Nights on the Road” conveys the young
women’s frustration with their confinement by describing the way they would
dream of automobile rides while cruising up and down the hallway in
wheelchairs, “popping wheelies down the hall / on our little trip to nowhere.”
The image is engaging and emotionally effective, but it is amplified by the
very next poem, “A Votive Light,” in which an actual automobile trip is
described as the narrator is taken to the hospital to give birth. The wheelies
of the previous poem are echoed in the way the “station wagon hits all / the 23rd
street pot holes.” Taylor masterfully creates overtones and echoes that keep
the reader emotionally engaged.
The
best poem of the book’s first section is certainly “A Kind of Food,” in which
Taylor’s elusive narrator informs us that “Banana is the food of charities /
always on the table in plastic bowls / day old, week old, blackened.” She goes
on to vividly describe “the dried up stems curled like nuns’ / arthritic
fingers, eternal crooks.” The image is so effective not just because it is
exceedingly clear but also because it carries so much of the young narrator’s
feelings about her benefactors/captors. As the poem progresses we see these
feelings turn inward:
we
will know each other
when
we meet in the real world
someday
– the post office, supermarket,
cleaners
– by the lingering odor
oozing
under our skin, old oily shame.
To work so much emotional impact,
so much emotional complexity, out of a banana is surely the feat of a very
gifted poet.
Even
more affecting are the epistolary poems which make up the second section of the
book, poems written in the voice of a nun placed in charge of the infants in
the nursery. These letters to one of the children formerly in her care are
tender and vivid, an exquisite evocation of love and longing. They are poems
about our desire to belong to someone, but, in a powerful reversal, it is the
nun’s desire to belong to the child that is so moving in these poems. She
writes
You
were a meteor falling into a cold furnace, your
mother’s
sobs receding hour by hour, your new
ghost
ancestors a huddle of dutiful nuns.
It
fell to us to finally break the crusty cord. That
moment
you were freed, untethered, floating with
the
other beautiful sad babies bedded down in the
infant
nursery. Except that you weren’t sad. We
were
never sad, were we little falling star?
The suggestion of separation in the
image of the broken cord is powerfully, because desperately, contradicted by
the we urgently repeated in the last
two lines. We see also, in the sister’s description of herself as a ghost, the
longing to be made solid by belonging to someone. This deep longing is
demonstrated also in the nun’s wild and tender variations in how she addresses
the child: “Dear little flame,” “Dear flower fist,” “Dear birthday candle,”
Dear little chirp,” “Little ear, dear angel drum,” “Dear little wind behind the
rain,” just to name a few. These letters are so sweetly sorrowful, I recommend
against reading them in public, as you are likely to embarrass yourself as I
did trying to cry inconspicuously while waiting for my daughter’s swimming
lesson to end.
The
book ends with a third section of three brief and lovely lyrics. These final
three poems find a common grace in the human voice, in our ability to sing our
sorrows:
I
would make some everlasting blues
from
the sound my baby must have made
to
her new mother when she saw her, saved
from
the orphanage, the pity of those nuns’
soft-singing
world.
A
song for nuns. A song
for
the long sobriety.
Contemporary poets rarely get this mixture
of sadness and sweetness so right, so close to the tone of Feste’s final song
in Twelfth Night or the final stanza
of Yeats’ “Song of Wandering Angus.” As the book ends, the narrator – perhaps
many years later, perhaps seeking spiritual rest in a convent retreat—listens
“to the sisters singing alleluia into silence.” The line sums up well the experience
of reading this book, its play between song and silence, its affirmation of
life even when the living is difficult. The
Lady Victory is fine poetry because it is well-executed but also because it
is well-felt. Regardless of the facts, the emotions ring true. Isn’t that at
least one of the things we look for in good poetry?
Friday, March 1, 2013
Friday, December 28, 2012
Spots of Time: A Review of Kathleen Johnson's Subterranean Red
Kathleen Johnson, SubterraneanRed (Mongrel Empire Press, 2012)
Kathleen Johnson’s Subterranean
Red treats of memory in the form of murmur and of snapshot. Like a
character in a gothic novel held captive by a ghostly lover, the poet is
haunted by a past she would rather escape and yet, despite herself, courts in
her imagination. This past is often evoked visibly in the series of family
photos that accompany the text, a technique reminiscent of Jeanetta Calhoun
Mish’s very successful Work is Love Made
Visible. Rather than bringing back the past, however, these pictures and
the poems which they accompany serve to remind the reader that what time has
broken can never again be made whole, that memory is always a matter of
arranging and rearranging the fragments. Remembering is imagining.
The theme of the past’s constant murmuring in the
consciousness of the poet is established in the collection’s first poem, “The
Apothecary of Minerva Best.” As throughout the book, memory presents itself as
both desirable and painful:
I’m
left with an ache as faint
and
elusive as the sound in
a
conch put to my ear.
The
ebb and flow now
no
more than a murmur
or
a memory.
The image of the conch summarizes well the way in which
memory is sought as a pleasure yet remains elusive and painful. Johnson adds to
this theme by the use of internal and occasional rhymes throughout the book.
The faint rhyming becomes a form of echo, of murmur. Take for example these
lines from “Three Generations of Cherokee Women: A Portrait,” in which she
describes her great-grandmother:
She’s
seen them come and seen them
go.
The stories she could tell
I’ll
never know. But her hands look like
they’ve
wrung a thousand chicken necks.
There is enough ghost of the iamb in these lines to accent
the rhyme of go and know, but the line breaks skillfully
work to half bury the rhyme. This effect is even more powerful in the beautifully
evocative “Wild Sand Plums”:
Roadside
sunflowers face the sun,
sway
in the wind.
Near
the cornfield, I bend
to
pick up a mottled feather.
The rhyme is of course both aural (wind and bend) and
visual, the figure in the poem bending in rhyme with the top-heavy sunflowers. Enacting
the way imagination constructs the past, the poem builds itself from echoes and
murmurs. Johnson’s poems are this carefully constructed throughout Subterranean Red.
Many of the poems in this volume are written in the psychologically
frank fashion we have for over half a century now referred to as
“confessional,” but these poems nevertheless recognize, as does the best work
of Robert Lowell, the role of imagination in framing and shaping memory. The
accompanying photos rather than representing proof of a definitive past are
offered rather as self-conscious constructions of family history. At times, the
photos, like the poems, represent an effort to remake that history, as in
“Granddad Scott”:
On
my wall I keep a picture
so
I won’t remember him just as a cruel man:
in
a white dress and turned-up cap,
he
is a blue-eyed baby
grinning
on
his daddy’s lap.
At other times they are emblems of something more like
negative versions of Wordsworth’s “spots of time,” as in “Father’s Day”:
And
I realize that the line from my dream
has
something to do with
this
picture, that even in sleep I cannot
rest,
but must forever watch
him
falling off that fence,
falling
to pieces.
In both versions, be it dream or wakeful and willed effort,
the photo represents the activity of the poet’s imagination. The pictures, like
the poems, don’t capture the past: they shape it. As Johnson says in “Following
the Red Hills Home,” “the imagined is as real as the rest of it.” It is
Johnson’s sharp imagination, along with her artistic presentation and
self-consciousness, that keeps the poems about, for instance, her father’s
philandering from descending into the sort of cheap latter-day confessional
poetry that relies on shock and attitude rather than on craft and rumination.
In “Raven Mocker” Johnson gives us the raven as an image of,
among other things, poetic inspiration, something beautiful but also dark and
dangerous. Such a bird is a fitting mascot for these poems, alive to the point
of tense contact with death itself, earthly scavengers yet transcendent in
flight. Subterranean Red is a
poignant, powerful book of poems that will be reread for many years to come.
Friday, September 14, 2012
Four Great Titles From New York Quarterly Books
My second book, Lapse
Americana, is due out from New York Quarterly Books on February 2. In the
meantime, here are four of my favorite titles already out from NYQ Books:
These poems are simultaneously tough-minded and
tender-hearted. For example, check out the opening lines of “A Typical Day 31
Years Ago”:
was
watching my mother die.
Part
of the tumor that would
eventually
strangle her
came
out of her mouth
like
a cheap party trick,
just
in time for the feast
of
the epiphany.
Weil’s Catholicism (see his brilliant two-part essay on that
topic on The The Poetry Blog) leads him to a poetics that emphasizes the
sacramental and the incarnated. The poems abound with physical detail, real
images of real life that point to the paradoxical dignity we find in bearing
the indignity of humanity. The poems are direct and smart. This may just be the
best book of poetry I have read this year.
This book makes me think of C.S. Lewis’s observation that
the sonnet sequences of the 16th century were not narrative but rather
“symphonic.” I think what Lewis meant is that the background story (whether
Shakespeare’s love triangle with the “Dark Lady” and “Young Man” or Sidney as
Astrophel in love with Stella) is felt rather than followed. That symphonic
effect is certainly evident in After the
Ark, which has as its background story the marital dissolution of the
poet’s parents and the death of his mother. Johnson doesn’t give us a blow by
blow account of the end of that marriage or of the end of his mother’s life;
rather he invites us into the emotional landscape of a family’s collapse. The
result of this technique is that we are moved along with the poet. He doesn’t
dictate to us what he felt; he invites us along for the emotional ride. Much of
this emotion is conveyed through powerful images, doing much to revive Eliot’s
concept of the “objective correlative.” Consider the last two lines of
“Pageant, Christmas Eve”: “Houselights snuffed, the dark became an empty /
ribcage, the tree our flickering heart.” Wow! Another very effective image is
that at the end of “Flood” in which, sitting beneath a tin roof listening to
the rain, the mourners for Johnson’s mother “put her shoes outside and watched
them fill.” That is a powerful image of absence and loss.
Maybe I should declare up front that Amanda Bradley is a
friend of mine from graduate school. But then again, so what? I have lots of
friends whose books I don’t like, and I simply avoid reviewing them. Amanda has
saved me a lot of awkwardness by writing a very good book. The best description
of this book is probably its title, which captures well the unique blend of the
harrowing and the whimsical that one finds throughout Oz at Night. A great example is “To Thomas Pynchon Regarding The Crying of Lot 49,” which would seem
to inaugurate a new kind of poem: the academic confessional. Recalling the
agony of digging through Pynchon’s book, she says, “Was that on purpose? I want
to punch / your reclusive face. Where are you, Pynchon?” The poem is funny,
especially to anyone who has struggled with the intellectual demands of
academic work, but it is also very personal. Finding herself lost in a maze of
critical theory and interpretation, she ends with the confession that “by page
111, I couldn’t believe myself.” This is
a witty poem on the academic life, but it is also a very brave poem about
self-doubt. In some ways it reminded me of Ginsberg’s “America,” and I wanted
to add “It occurs to me that I am Thomas Pynchon./ I am talking to myself
again.” Other poems in the collection wrestle with the same issues of identity and
self-doubt. In “I am not what I would like to be nor what I will become,” she
says “I am not Matt Damon, nor someone who carries an alligator purse.” This is
a very striking way of addressing identity and the painful process of deriving
it by means of negation. The poems in Oz
at Night are not confessional in the Plath, Sexton, Lowell mode, but they
do leave one with the impression that Oz is an internal landscape, as
simultaneously alien and familiar as the depths of our own minds revealed in
dreams.
Margrave offers something rarely seen in contemporary
poetry: wit. It’s not just that the book is often funny, though it is. I mean
“wit” in the seventeenth-century sense, the play of intellect. “Perishable” is
a good example of this quality. Margrave
begins the poem with a description of cleaning out his recently deceased father’s
refrigerator and ends with the observation that “a man is more perishable than
his food.” The poem has certain Donne-like qualities, the witty conceit and the
memento mori. Indeed, memento mori – the medieval and Renaissance
trope of calling to mind one’s impending death – is the unifying theme of this
book. Margrave treats this theme with humor and genuine pathos.
I will most likely recommend more from NYQ Books in the
months ahead. In the meantime, if you want to get a better sense of the
philosophy behind the operation, see me review of editor Raymond Hammond’sbook, Poetic Amusement. Or, better
yet, buy a copy of Poetic Amusement
and read it yourself.
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)